in SEO
Recently, seoClarity analyzed more than 50,000 keywords and found that AI Overviews appeared in roughly 30% of desktop searches and that 97% of AI Overviews cited at least one URL from the top 20 organic results. In other words, if you are not already performing well in traditional search, you are very unlikely to earn visibility in AI-generated snapshots.
The implication for SEOs is clear: technical excellence is now a prerequisite not only for ranking, but also for being “read” and reused by AI systems.
This article looks at three core pillars of technical SEO in this new environment:
Crawlability and indexation
Page purpose and intent clarity
Structured data and semantic signals
The goal is to help you move beyond simple hygiene and toward a technical foundation that plays well with both ranking algorithms and AI answer engines.
If Google cannot reliably crawl and index your pages, AI will never see them.
Crawlability is not a new concept, but it matters more in a world where the index is increasingly selective, and AI layers pull almost exclusively from highly trusted, well-crawled pages. When Google decides what to include in AI Overviews, it is choosing from content it has already crawled, rendered, and understood.
Search Engine Land sums this up nicely: log file analysis is the only accurate way to see how crawlers really move through your site, which URLs they prioritize, and where crawl budget is being wasted. Crawl budget is simply the number of URLs a bot will request on your domain in a given period. Since bots will not crawl everything, your job is to make those crawls count.
Practical actions:
Audit server logs regularly to see which sections of your site attract the most crawler hits and which important templates are being ignored. Tools like Screaming Frog, Botify, Lumar, or custom log parsers can make this manageable at scale.
Fix crawl traps and junk parameters that lead to infinite URL combinations, such as unchecked calendars, layered filters, or session IDs. These can soak up crawl budget with zero SEO value.
Use robots.txt, canonicals, and noindex to guide bots away from low-value URLs and toward high-value, content-rich pages.
Many SaaS and B2B sites now run on JS-heavy frameworks. Google has improved its rendering pipeline over the years. Regardless, the same principle holds: the more you rely on client-side rendering for critical content, the greater the risk that crawlers will miss something or delay indexation.
You can reduce that risk by:
Preferring server-side rendering (SSR) or hybrid rendering for core templates whenever possible.
Testing key URLs with Google’s URL Inspection tool and headless crawlers to confirm that rendered HTML contains the content and internal links you depend on.
If Google cannot “see” your copy and links in the first pass, you are starting at a disadvantage for rankings and AI surfacing.
Core Web Vitals remain a performance tie-breaker. Google has repeatedly framed page experience as a ranking factor, but not the primary one. However, faster, leaner sites tend to be crawled more efficiently because each request uses fewer resources.
Tactically, that means:
Optimizing HTML and CSS
Reducing JS payloads
Leveraging caching and CDNs
A site that is quick to respond, internally consistent, and free from crawl traps is much easier for Google to scan, understand, and reuse inside AI-generated responses.
Once your pages are crawlable, the next question is not “What keywords are here?” but “What is this page for, and whose problem does it solve?”
Recent core updates have leaned more into intent satisfaction and content usefulness. Google’s log-and-click data allows it to downrank pages that users quickly abandon, and reward pages that clearly meet searcher goals. In an AI context, that same evaluation informs which URLs are safe to quote or summarize in AI Overviews.
Each indexable page should have a single, clearly defined “job” in your ecosystem. That job might be:
Educating a beginner
Comparing options for someone in the consideration phase
Driving a specific conversion or sign-up
Confused pages that try to serve multiple intents at once tend to underperform. For example:
A “guide” that turns into a sales pitch halfway through
A product page that also tries to rank for “what is…” definitions
Multiple thin posts that all vaguely target the same keyword
These patterns create ambiguity for both users and AI, leading to internal cannibalization.
Better patterns:
Consolidate thin or overlapping content into authoritative hubs that comprehensively and clearly convey their primary intent. This mirrors what successful publishers like NerdWallet have done with their finance clusters, where each hub guides users from informational questions through to tools and comparisons.
Align templates to intent types: for example, “What is X?” and “How to do X” might both live in a single, well-structured guide, while “Best tools for X” belongs in a comparison or list format aimed at commercial intent.
Meta descriptions were long treated as an afterthought. In the AI era, they act as human-authored summaries that help both users and AI models quickly understand the page's purpose.
Sky SEO’s AI Overview ranking guide notes that clear and descriptive titles and meta descriptions are common traits across pages cited in AI Overviews. Other AI Overview studies recommend treating meta descriptions like mini value propositions that reinforce the intent and unique angle of your content.
These signals help click-through rates, but they also make your page easier for AI systems to classify and reuse.
AI models are excellent at regurgitating generic answers. That raises the bar for what human-created content must do to stand out.
Patterns that are working well now:
Covering the main question and the natural follow-ups in one place, often by incorporating FAQ sections or “People Also Ask”-style questions.
Adding original research, case studies, or proprietary frameworks that AI cannot infer from existing content.
Highlighting first-hand experience and expert commentary that reinforce E-E-A-T signals.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), a framework proposed by First Page Sage, makes this explicit. It encourages brands to create “source-worthy” content that AI systems will want to reference, not just rank.
That starts with a clear purpose, depth, and uniqueness.
Structured data used to be mostly about rich snippets. Now it is also about teaching AI what your entities are and how they relate to each other.
Schema markup in JSON-LD format gives search engines and AI models a machine-readable summary of your page. It defines:
The type of thing on the page (Article, Product, FAQPage, HowTo, Event, etc.)
The entities involved (Organization, Person, Place, CreativeWork)
The attributes and relationships between those entities
Modern AI SEO guides consistently highlight structured data as a key factor in AI Overview eligibility and in how confidently AI can pull facts from your site.
For B2B and SaaS sites, a practical schema roadmap usually includes:
Organization on your About, footer, or sitewide template, including logo, URLs, sameAs links to verified profiles, and key facts.
Person for authors and experts, tied to Article markup. This helps Google and AI systems associate expertise with real people.
Article / BlogPosting / NewsArticle on editorial content, with headline, description, author, date, and publisher.
FAQPage Schema on pages with distinct Q&A sections.
HowTo on step-by-step tutorials.
Product / Software Application / Offer, where relevant, especially on product and pricing pages.
Beyond these, you can add schema for videos, events, courses, or podcasts, depending on your content mix.
Generative AI and modern search algorithms increasingly think in terms of entities rather than keywords. When your schema clearly describes entities and links them together, you provide high-confidence signals that:
You are the same organization that appears on LinkedIn, Crunchbase, or Wikipedia.
A given person on your site is a real expert with a consistent public footprint.
A given article is about a specific product, topic, or problem.
That is the kind of structure AI systems look for when deciding whether to quote you, show your logo, or use your copy to answer a query.
Guides from tools like Cension AI and Sky SEO both stress that well-implemented schema increases the odds of being selected and cited in AI Overviews.
To make schema work for you:
Prefer JSON-LD embedded in your templates rather than inline microdata.
Validate new templates with Google’s Rich Results Test and the Schema.org validator.
Monitor Search Console Enhancements reports for warnings and errors.
Keep markup in sync with visible content. Misaligned or outdated schema can erode trust.
You can also use schema to connect internal entities and essentially build a mini knowledge graph on your site. For example, link Article → Person (author) → Organization (publisher) to paint a coherent picture of who is saying what on behalf of which brand.
All three pillars work best when they line up with your broader content architecture.
In practice, that means:
Designing topic clusters where technical scaffolding clearly reflects topical relationships. For example, grouping URLs in subfolders like /seo/technical-seo/ and reinforcing those relationships with internal links and breadcrumb schema.
Using log files to validate crawl behavior against your ideal cluster map. If Googlebot spends most of its time on low-value filters instead of pillar and hub pages, you have a technical problem that directly affects rankings and AI visibility.
Targeting GEO opportunities by pairing high-quality, intent-aligned content with rock-solid technical foundations, so that when AI Overviews look for “best source” candidates, your pages check every box.
This is where technical SEO stops being “just plumbing” and starts acting as a multiplier on your broader SEO strategy.
AI snapshots and generative answers are not killing SEO. They are raising the bar for technical and semantic clarity.
To compete in this environment, your site needs to:
Be easily crawlable and indexable, with crawl budget focused on pages that matter.
Present pages with clear, focused purposes that fully satisfy user intent.
Use structured data and entity signals to make your content straightforward for machines to parse and reuse.
Do that consistently, and you are not only improving your traditional rankings but also increasing your odds of being chosen as a trusted source when AI systems build their answers.
Technical SEO in 2025 is no longer just about making a site work. It is your semantic translator between human content and machine understanding. If you get that translation right, you will be well-positioned for whatever shape search and AI take next.
AI Overviews primarily pull from URLs that Google already trusts, understands, and ranks well. That trust is built through strong crawlability, clean rendering, clear page purpose, and properly implemented structured data. If Google cannot consistently crawl and interpret your content, it is unlikely to be selected as a source in AI-generated summaries.
For most sites, it’s crawlability. If Googlebot cannot reliably access your key pages due to crawl traps, rendering issues, or wasted crawl budget, nothing else—content, schema, or E-E-A-T—can compensate. Ensuring a clean crawl path and fast rendering is the foundation for all AI-era ranking improvements.
Yes, but they act more like tie-breakers than primary ranking factors. Faster, more efficient pages tend to get crawled and rendered more smoothly, which can indirectly improve indexation and ranking stability. CWV won’t get you into an AI Overview on their own, but poor performance can hold you back.
For most B2B and SaaS sites, Organization, Person (author), Article/BlogPosting, FAQPage, and HowTo schema provide the strongest semantic clarity. These tell Google what the page is, who created it, and how it fits into your broader entity graph. AI systems prefer to cite content that has clean, unambiguous, structured data.
Look at behavior and SERP alignment. High bounce rates, short dwell time, and poor rankings despite strong content often indicate a mismatch between the page’s purpose and the user’s goal. Each page should do one specific job, and do it fully. If two pages target the same intent, consider consolidating them into one stronger resource.